Contact Us

Here becomes an excellent example in my own three-paragraph explanation with laws and constitutional citations showing how the People can form their own quorum or jury of peers outside agency/administrative law in both Arizona and the United States of America.  Book me and I can build plans for anywhere in the world.

The right to trial by jury is guaranteed in the U.S. Constitution, Article III, Section 2 and the Sixth Amendment: “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed.” The Seventh Amendment extends jury rights to civil matters exceeding twenty dollars. These provisions establish that juries are not creations of administrative agencies but of the People themselves. Thus, a quorum of peers convened by the People under common law carries constitutional legitimacy independent of agency law.

The Arizona Constitution, Article 2 (Declaration of Rights), Sections 23 and 24, secures the People’s right to trial by jury in both criminal and civil cases: “The right of trial by jury shall remain inviolate.” Arizona law also requires that grand juries and petit juries be drawn from the body of the People, not administrative offices. This means the People of Arizona may lawfully assemble as a quorum or jury of peers so long as due process standards (notice, impartiality, fair hearing) are observed. Such assemblies are rooted in the People’s sovereignty, not in agency discretion.

The First Amendment guarantees the right of the People to peaceably assemble and petition for redress of grievances. Combined with the Ninth and Tenth Amendments, which reserve undelegated powers to the People, this affirms that the People may convene their own bodies — quorums, assemblies, or juries — outside administrative law when seeking justice or settling disputes. These People’s juries stand on the same constitutional footing as any state or federal jury, provided they operate by principles of due process and impartiality, echoing the maxim that sovereignty ultimately resides in the People (Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U.S. 419 (1793)).